Our Latest Photos

Dreams Bliss Heather Mill Extra Virgin Calanque Old Desert Gull Mediterranean Forest of Masts Little Bird Wind Blown

View Our Entire Photostream

You Are Here: History > Why Luther Went to Rome
Aug
21

Why Luther Went to Rome

Motivation is one of the most difficult things to determine, even for people who are alive, as any therapist will tell you. The shelves of Luther biographies have accumulated more than their fair share of psychoanalysts. And not without reason. Luther’s fervent piety, the intense anxiety he showed over his own salvation, the degree to which he desired—yet constantly failed—to achieve any peace with God, the later demonization of his opponents: all these suggest an extraordinarily rich and complicated character. Why was he in particular so unable to tolerate a theological and ecclesiastical system that plenty of others—even reformers of the past themselves—managed to work within and around?

But all this is yet to come for Luther. In 1510 his motivations were somewhat simpler. That’s why his pilgrimage is easier to recreate than so many of the other bits of his history, tied as they were to words and meetings. The land remains to a greater degree than any of the personalities he interacted with. Luther was sent to Rome by his order. Other motivations would have been quite secondary to his primary obedience.

He was, of course, curious about the land between Erfurt and Rome. Notes from his later conversations at table show a healthy interest in the people, customs, and flora of his journey. More particular was his attention to technical and organizational differences: a mechanical clock in Nuremberg, the foundling house in Florence. Absent seems to be any interest in the visual culture of the Renaissance that would have surrounded him in Bologna or Siena.

And he would have been motivated by the chance to do pious works in Rome—the most holy city of all Christendom (with the possible exception of the difficult-to-reach, Mameluk-controlled Jerusalem). Contrary to popular opinion—created, in all likelihood, by later Reformation polemics—Rome wasn’t thought holy primarily because of the Pope. The papacy was a conflicted institution in 1510; the popes of Luther’s time were respected in public but the subjects of scathing satire and critique by many prominent churchmen for their glaring shortcomings.

No, for Western Christians, Rome was first of all the city of martyrs. When Luther saw the steeples and domes in the distance he reports himself to have descended to his knees and cried, “Be greeted, most holy Rome.” Holy because it was bathed in the blood of what was believed at the time to have been hundreds of thousands of Christians slain by pagan officials for confessing Christ. The merit of these most holy believers was accessible through countless holy acts. Luther surely would have looked forward to these opportunities.

But even this was a secondary purpose. His primary reason—if not motivation—was a rather arcane errand of his order. The Erfurt house and its prior, Johann Nathin, belonged to a reform movement among the Augustinians that sought to expand a more strict observance of the rule. The houses in Nuremberg, Kulmbach, and Erfurt were particularly fervent, and they objected strongly to an effective merger of the reformed with the province at large announced on September 30, 1510—a union forced upon them by Luther’s later friend and influential advisor John Staupitz, who was at the time head of the Saxon congregation.

Union would water down the reforming cause, the strict observants believed. And so an alliance of the strict decided to appeal to the vicar general, Giles (Egidio) of Viterbo, in Rome. There was clearly some urgency about the appeal. It seems likely they wanted to try and get to Rome before the passes of the Alps became completely… well, impassable.

Five years of study and earnest religious life had brought Luther to the attention of his brothers. A combination of his demonstrated potential and vigorous youth made him an ideal candidate for what was sure to be a demanding journey. And so in November of 1510 he left Erfurt. He would not have traveled alone, for such was forbidden by the rule. He was likely accompanied by Anton Kresz, from the observant house in Nuremberg, who is believed to have been the one in charge of the appeal.

As to their mode of transport: they walked. Such was their lot as friars. Horses and carriages belonged to soldiers and nobility. Despite being among the best educated and respected people of the time, walking fit their voluntary lowliness. Suffering and humiliation were part of the program. Pilgrimage was penance, after all.

Be Sociable, Share!

Related Posts

8 Responses to Why Luther Went to Rome

    GORDON says:

    AS A LUTHERAN IN NORTHERN MAINE (Augustana Snod), I FIND THIS MOST EDUCATIONAL AND INTERESTING. THUS, WILL FORWARD TO EDITOR OF OUR CHURCH BUKKETIN — share with congrgants– GOD SPEED WITH YOUR WORK —- HASTEN TO MOLD AND BLEND ALL CHRISTIANITY IN TO ONE !!!!!! gre

    paul sailhamer says:

    My wife and I just returned from helping to lead a Reformation Tour of 300 people from Prague (Jan Hus), through the German Luther Lands, including a night at Oberammergau, on to Zurich (Zwingli) and Geneva (Calvin). It was our third time to make the trip. The sponsor was the Evangelical Christian Radio Ministry, Insight for Living.

    I have been a charter subscriber of First Things but I am not a Roman Catholic. I subscribed when RJ Neuhaus was still a Lutheran but stayed with the magazine and always find it helpful. I personally am not convinced that the issue that Luther said “the church stands or falls on”, justification by faith alone, is shared by the Roman Church and evangelical Lutherans. I will be interested to follow your journey…I am a walker, and have often thought about the journey you are taking. Thanks for inviting us to virtually go along!

    paul sailhamer says:

    I forgot to mention…Those that would like a sample of our own recent Reformation Tour can go to Insight.org and click on Reformation Tour Blog to see a short, daily review of our own journey.

    Fred Schumacher says:

    Dear Sarah and Andrew:

    Will be following your pilgrimage.

    The Lord Be With you.

    FJS

    Albert de Pury says:

    A great project, a promising start, and a very stimulating way of putting things into focus ! Anne and I are in thoughts with the three of you starting out on your fabulous trek ! A.+ A. de Pury

    Shirley Midthun says:

    I am reading with great interest your designated journey.At 73 years old, I
    have forgotten much of this information since my confirmation classes.

    Considering that the purpose of Luther’s journey was to prevent unity, your walk plot certainly thickens. We’re praying along with you.

    Pingback: Ecumenists Cross the Tiber » First Thoughts | A First Things Blog

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow Us!

Facebook Twitter RSS Feed Email

Facebook Fans...

Tweets...

    Tags

    change Rick Steves Ten Commandments mystics Liechtenstein Finland cities Dominican Bach Dante consensus sacraments spiritual ecumenism One Mediator Saints and Mary Pentecostal Milan Apology to the Augsburg Confession Week of Prayer for Christian Unity theology of the cross honesty Jews Institute for Ecumenical Research memmingen Apennines Biel mysticism Luther Coburg Vatican 2 love Vaduz walk Germany Catholic law and gospel monk relics Orthodox Lutheran monks baptism Bamberg marble Calvin St. Paul Volker Leppin pilgrimage charismatic Zapfendorf Sweden Santiago de Compostela sanctification Benedictine fasting anti-Semitism Augsburg Confession Strasbourg Melanchthon Leuenberg Agreement amen university canal Baptism Eucharist and Ministry Unitatis Redintegratio post-pilgrimage word anti-Judaism Neresheim St. Peter Joint Declaration Nördlingen prayer Vorarlberg Otto Hermann Pesch justification Robert Louis Stevenson Geneva Ulm Florence Erfurt martyr mediator Johannes Tauler Vierzehnheiligen communion Thomas Aquinas promise Babylonian Captivity church Methodist miracle ecumenical concepts Ambrose Renaissance Reformation mission Lutheran World Federation Reformed truth and love righteousness Australia freedom St. Augustine Augsburg College dialogue Holy Spirit specialization Siena Lent St. James Commentary on the Magnificat World Council of Churches convergence Franciscan Bible forgiveness Chiavenna unity Mediterranean John Wesley reception Christ Heidelberg Disputation Edinburgh Missionary Conference grace Staupitz gift Alps nature of God Confessions Protestant Freedom of a Christian worship Switzerland Wittenberg Rhine Gutenberg Tuscany rain Eisfeld saints St. Augustine House conversion German eucharist Bernard of Clairvaux Augustine Lutheran differentiated consensus liturgy Creeds Kilian McDonnell Anabaptist Cardinal Kasper marriage Scripture Mortalium Animos good works Bregenz vernacular patience predestination penance Martin Luther Witness to Jesus Christ Oettingen translation 8th commandment Friar Nuremberg monasticism Large Catechism Allgäu Advent Lombardy language Roanoke God Mary misunderstanding Rome 95 theses Baroque church-dividing spiritual disciplines Emilia-Romagna different traditions Mennonite spirituality Liguria Bavaria Austria Kempten ecumenism Via Francigena Henri de Lubac Augustinian faith Lazio Small Catechism Italy hiking

    Brought to you by...

    ...you!